Back in the late 20th century, researchers and manufacturers woke up to the mess left by traditional plasticizers—phthalates lingered everywhere, and their impacts on people and the planet started creeping into conversations across boardrooms and labs. The demand for friendlier alternatives kicked into high gear, and biobased options slowly gained traction. Out of this quest, CITROFOL BI emerged, crafted by serious chemists at Jungbunzlauer using renewable citrus feedstocks. People pushed for bio-based chemistry not just because it sounded good, but because governments and big companies started feeling the squeeze from regulations. The introduction of CITROFOL BI mirrored a bigger shift toward products that don’t stick a toxic legacy to every piece of plastic we hold today.
CITROFOL BI—also encountered as tributyl O-acetylcitrate—carries a reputation for being a genuinely non-phthalate plasticizer sourced from plant-based ingredients. It looks like a clear, slightly yellowish liquid and feels quite oily to the touch. What instantly makes it stand out is its source from citric acid—yes, the same molecule found in lemons and oranges. Most plasticizers on the market stem from petroleum, but this one sidesteps fossil sources and heads straight for biorenewable resources. It's become a reliable substitute in sensitive applications such as children’s toys, food packaging, and medical devices, where folks don’t want legacy chemicals leaching into what they eat, touch, or inject.
Once you get past the marketing gloss, CITROFOL BI comes down to reliable chemistry. It has a boiling point around 230°C at reduced pressure. The flashpoint sits above 170°C, making it less flammable than plenty of similar compounds used in industry. Viscosity lands in the range of 22 mPa·s at 20°C, so you won’t find it running off surfaces like water, but it won’t gum up processing equipment either. It’s stable and doesn’t mix with water but has good solubility in many organic solvents. The substance holds up to UV exposure and doesn’t easily break down, supporting long product life cycles. Its compatibility with common polymers like PVC, PLA, and other plastics has been tested in labs and at industrial scale. These properties let it fill in the gaps left by more controversial or less robust plasticizers.
Manufacturers typically offer CITROFOL BI with a minimum purity level exceeding 98%. The acid value falls below 0.15 mg KOH/g, keeping free acid content almost negligible. The ester content dominates, giving the compound its characteristic physical strength and flexibility boost to finished products. For labeling, packages must reflect regulations across various regions. REACH registration, FDA food contact notification, and Kosher or Halal certificates may all apply. Full traceability from fermentation tank to packaging drum keeps something like CITROFOL BI trustworthy amid today’s complex supply networks. Packages carry hazard labeling, even though toxicological risks for end users rank low, but safety data sheets still demand attention. The focus remains transparency—raw material origin, processing aids, and batch certifications get communicated down the supply chain to help users pick the right product for their requirements.
The recipe for CITROFOL BI starts with citric acid, usually extracted by fermenting sugar sources like molasses or corn syrup using specific strains of Aspergillus niger fungus. Chemists convert citric acid into acetyl tributyl citrate through esterification: they react citric acid with butanol in the presence of an acid catalyst, followed by acetylation with acetic anhydride. Every stage occurs under temperature-controlled conditions to optimize yield and avoid impurities. Solvents and catalysts must be filtered out or neutralized. The final mixture undergoes purification through distillation and filtration to remove color, odor, and any remaining byproducts. The result pours out as a clean, high-purity liquid tailored for safe use. Each step of the process links back to raw materials that don’t carry petroleum’s baggage, which reduces long-term risks for both clients and communities.
CITROFOL BI behaves as a typical ester, which means it can undergo hydrolysis in harsh alkaline or acidic conditions, breaking down into acetylcitrate and butanol. This property influences its environmental footprint—once in soil or water, microorganisms can help decompose CITROFOL BI into smaller, safer fragments. Modifications, such as partial hydrolysis or oxidation, have drawn attention from chemists trying to tweak the balance of flexibility and durability in target applications. Research groups sometimes focus on functionalizing the citrate backbone to further cut migration or increase compatibility with particular polymers. These tweaks keep the product viable for ever-tougher uses and regulations, and there's always someone in the lab ready to squeeze out a few extra years of stability from such bio-based plasticizers.
The chemical community knows CITROFOL BI by a bucketload of names—tributyl O-acetylcitrate, acetyl tributyl citrate (ATBC), 77-90-7 (its CAS number). Certain product labels in the market stick to brand-associated names like Jungbunzlauer’s “CITROFOL BI,” but plenty of technical documents refer to it as ATBC or simply acetyl tributyl citrate. On a supplier invoice or in safety sheets, you might spot phrases like “citrate ester” or “bio-based plasticizer for PVC.” For all the naming, the stuff inside the drum stays the same—the variation just reflects the company selling or the context in which it appears, whether it’s medical PVC tubing or wrap for your sandwich.
Nobody wants surprises in the workshop or on the production floor, so safety has to come before anything else—even for benign alternatives like CITROFOL BI. Workers need standard PPE: gloves, splash-safe goggles, and clothing that shields from chemical splashes. Even though CITROFOL BI rates low on acute toxicity, handling large amounts without precautions invites accidents or irritation. Facilities storing or using CITROFOL BI have to check proper ventilation, keep drums tightly sealed, and avoid open flames to dodge fire risks as outlined by its flash point data. The regulatory landscape demands compliance with OSHA, REACH, and GHS labeling guidelines, linking every safety protocol right back to documentation and training, not just good intent. On the upside, you can practically eliminate severe environmental harm through established spill management and wastewater treatment protocols, and waste byproducts often get recycled or safely degraded instead of building up.
Engineers and designers in a wide set of industries have leaned on CITROFOL BI. It finds main action in plasticizing polyvinyl chloride (PVC) for food-grade films, medical bags, blood collection tubing, and household wraps. Medical device manufacturers prefer it in catheters and flexible tubing because of its track record for low toxicity and biocompatibility—an important detail when the stuff sits next to patients all day. Alongside medical use, toy makers picked up on CITROFOL BI after regulators began closing in on phthalates. Food manufacturers tap it for food contact packaging, sealing films, and gaskets—anywhere consumers fear transfer of plastic ingredients into their meals. The automotive and construction sectors turn to it for wire sheathing, sealants, and flexible flooring. Bioplastic producers seek it for polylactic acid and other plant-based material blends to push up flexibility without compromising their credentials as “green” solutions. The breadth of applications shows just how many corners of daily life depend on safe, stable plasticizers.
University and industry labs stay busy chasing improvements to make products like CITROFOL BI more versatile and cost-effective. Studies hunt down ways to shrink migration rates, deliver smoother mechanical properties, or pair the plasticizer with next-gen biopolymers. Academics lay out pilot studies comparing how well CITROFOL BI stacks up against fossil-based standards in food safety, mechanical endurance, and shelf life. Companies put money and brainpower behind finding production shortcuts that use less energy or deliver higher yields. Sometimes the focus drifts to smart additives or processing aids that keep the plasticizer locked in place even after years of use. Beyond core performance, researchers want plasticizers that break down without leaving behind toxic leftovers; here, CITROFOL BI gives them a running start, but perfection always seems just out of reach. Such incremental progress matters more than press releases—each one adds up, closing the gap between what society needs from plastics and what’s possible.
Toxicologists have put CITROFOL BI through a gauntlet of animal studies, cell cultures, and real-world simulation tests. The main story so far: it ranks low for acute and chronic toxicity, both for humans and animals. Exposure studies rarely show concerning levels of metabolites in blood or organs, and most regulatory agencies, including the US FDA and EFSA, have signed off its use in high-contact situations like food packaging. Migration levels fall under strict limits, ensuring end users aren't swallowing or absorbing amounts that would spark worry. Still, researchers stay wary about long-term and multi-generational effects, so periodic reviews turn up every new decade or so. Some fringe concerns linger around allergens or unusual metabolic pathways, but evidence to date signals a broad safety margin. The level of scrutiny mirrors high standards for the food chain and medical sector, certainly not the case for most older, petroleum-derived plasticizers.
As sustainability fever sweeps across government offices and consumer mindsets, products like CITROFOL BI stand ready to gain even wider adoption. Renewable feedstocks, low toxicity, and smooth integration into existing manufacturing have made biobased plasticizers not just a fad, but long-term solutions for stubborn material problems. Industry leaders continue to ask for higher performing, even more stable versions without the price spikes that sometimes trail new-green products. Improvements in biotechnology and green chemistry might soon drop raw material costs and raise purity even higher. Regulatory pressure—often criticized for lagging—may speed up as more countries build out their own toxic substance blacklists. A product with a clean record, confirmed by independent academic research and real-life data, stands to become a new industry benchmark. If bioplastics move beyond niche uses, CITROFOL BI could break out of specialty segments and ride a bigger wave into everything from cars to electronics, closing the loop on safe, sustainable design.
CITROFOL BI steps into the world of plasticizers with a big promise: make things soft, flexible, and safe. It’s a plasticizer derived from citric acid, the stuff found in lemons and oranges, so the “bio” badge isn’t just for marketing hype. You see its real value in products that need to flex without snapping or seeping out chemicals that mess with the body. I remember walking through a toy shop, picking up different toys to check labels, and finding out how much pressure there’s been on companies to get away from old-school plasticizers, the ones on endless recall lists.
People grew uneasy about certain plastics, especially those loaded with phthalates. Parents demanded answers, and governments cracked down. CITROFOL BI doesn’t just tick boxes for compliance – it usually goes into things that need extra trust. I’ve seen it in medical devices, baby care, even food packaging. Hospital tubing, for example, needs to bend and move without cracking, but the last thing anyone wants is a tube leaching something that could harm a patient. CITROFOL BI gives that flexibility minus the extra worry.
You’ll also find it in things like credit cards, vinyl flooring, and raincoats. Think of it as the “secret sauce” inside soft plastics that you keep close. Food wraps and cling films stay supple in the fridge instead of shattering, all thanks to a dose of plasticizer. If you open your kitchen drawers or your kid’s pencil box, odds are there’s something in there that owes its bend to this ingredient. Food contact safety keeps climbing the list of consumer priorities. CITROFOL BI provides reassurance with non-toxic roots, unlike petrochemical alternatives.
After years of reading product labels and talking with health-conscious friends, one thing became clear. Folks want less synthetic mystery in the stuff they use and more transparency from manufacturers. Phthalates gave plastic a bad name, blamed for hormone disruption, and some types even banned outright. Plant-based ingredients offer a way forward, and companies know customers spot the difference. A label highlighting “bio-based plasticizer” draws the modern shopper’s eye.
It’s not just about dodging harm. The footprint matters too. CITROFOL BI doesn’t begin its life in an oil drum. It starts from renewable crops, which builds real appeal as consumers push for green options. From my experience as someone who keeps watch on environmental trends, no company wants news about toxic plastics hurting kids or wildlife. So, CITROFOL BI checks multiple boxes: less risk, solid performance, and a better story to tell.
If you’re thinking about ways to push this shift further, there’s room to bring down costs through more efficient farming for raw materials or reusing plant waste. Regulations can adjust to encourage safer compounds, not just ban the worst offenders. Shoppers willing to pay a few cents more for safe, green materials help push the whole industry forward. Every product switched from old chemicals to a safer alternative like CITROFOL BI avoids potential legal headaches and builds trust.
Sticking with old plasticizers risks health and reputation. With options like CITROFOL BI available, it becomes easier to build products that don’t just work but respect the end user and the environment. The days of “out of sight, out of mind” are over. We owe it to ourselves to choose safer, smarter solutions.
CITROFOL BI steps up in the world of plastic additives as a citrate-based plasticizer. Basically, it helps soften plastics—think cables, flooring, and certain packaging—so products don’t end up brittle or rigid. The key difference here is that, compared to old-school plasticizers like phthalates, this one comes from citric acid—yes, the same family you find in citrus fruit.
Nobody wants another chemical leaching out of discarded plastic and hanging around in the soil for years. Pollution from microplastics and toxic additives isn't some distant concern; beach clean-ups and studies both show how bad things have gotten. So, when a company says its product is biodegradable and less harsh on the environment, people definitely want to know if that claim matches real-world results.
CITROFOL BI rides on a short backbone of plant-derived chemicals, which usually means easier and quicker breakdown. Researchers ran it through standard biodegradability tests: they found microbes tackle it much more easily than many traditional plasticizers. In a lab, after just a few weeks, a big chunk of it has already disappeared, turned into water, carbon dioxide, and simpler organic matter. European Union regulators give it a thumbs-up for use in sensitive settings, like food contact materials and toys, because it leaves behind far less residue.
Using CITROFOL BI in packaging and children’s products already lightens the load of nasty chemicals heading to landfills and compost heaps. In my neighborhood, people get nervous about what they toss in the blue bin. It turns out, swapping in plasticizers made from bio-based materials instead of petroleum actually reduces the long-term risk of contamination. Studies out of Germany tracked the fate of this additive in composting conditions and found natural breakdown, not just diluting the problem.
Yet, the story inside a plastic product is a little more complicated. If you throw away a piece of plastic loaded with CITROFOL BI, but it goes to an incinerator, biodegradability isn't really tested at all. Most municipal systems burn waste or send it to landfills with low oxygen, where even 'biodegradable' additives stall out. So actual environmental relief depends a lot on how we treat waste at the end of a product’s life. In places with strong composting or organic recycling, CITROFOL BI offers a real advantage. In other areas, improved systems still matter just as much as the material choices themselves.
The bigger goal comes down to deciding which chemicals are worth using in the first place. Every product brings along side effects. Choosing plasticizers like CITROFOL BI means companies move away from phthalates—additives linked to hormone disruption in wildlife and even in people. Sure, one plasticizer alone can't fix broken recycling systems, but it gives everyone—manufacturers, policy makers, and regular people shopping for toys or lunch wraps—a shot at making a difference with less worry about lingering toxins. Better information on breakdown, better recycling pathways, and continued swaps toward safer chemistry can close the gap between promises and real progress for the planet.
Giving buyers clear, honest data about what’s in their packaging and where it'll go after use makes a world of difference. Labeling and regulations drive manufacturers to keep checking if their products really fit the 'green' claims. On top of that, investing in recycling and composting infrastructure across cities actually lets biodegradable products like those containing CITROFOL BI prove their worth. Everyday action—combined with stronger rules that reward truly earth-friendly materials—pushes the standard even higher for what's acceptable in our plastics.
CITROFOL BI pops up across all sorts of manufacturing processes. Whenever big chemical names get tossed around, it’s easy to glaze over the details. I’ve run into it a few times, working with colleagues in both plastics and personal care. Its chemical personality actually stands out if you dig beneath the datasheets.
This additive’s real name is tributyl citrate. That alone tells a lot: “tri” points to three butyl groups hanging off a citric acid backbone. Tributyling—if you’ve poured it or sniffed it—reminds you it’s not just another bland plasticizer. It brings low odor and low volatility, which makes it safer and less harsh on the senses compared to old-school phthalates.
CITROFOL BI's molecular formula lands at C18H32O7. There’s an oily liquid with a faint, fruity scent, and it doesn’t easily solidify even in cooler temps, which plays a huge role in food packaging and sensitive applications. Unlike a lot of the heavyweights in this class, it isn’t loaded with ring structures (like benzene rings), so it comes off lighter, more flexible, and less likely to set off alarms on green chemistry audits.
It barely dissolves in water, keeping stability in humid environments. But it melts right into organic solvents and many common plastics. That trait alone walks it into PVC flooring, flexible toys, and even cosmetics. Materials won’t stiffen or crack as fast because the citrate keeps the polymer chains moving easily. I’ve watched manufacturers reach for it when they want performance but need to steer clear of phthalate regulations.
One compelling fact: CITROFOL BI has a boiling point up around 360°C. That’s high—so it won’t evaporate away in most processing conditions. At the same time, it resists breaking down from UV exposure and doesn’t react wildly with other additives. From experience, this translates to fewer worries about discoloration or breakdown if the final product heads outdoors or sees sunlight.
Concerns around chemical safety have changed how everyone looks at additives. Regulatory footage, product recalls, customer trust—these all hang in the balance. CITROFOL BI scores better than most plasticizers on the migration front. Its molecules are bigger and tend to stay put in finished goods, not leaching out as aggressively. Organizations testing for food safety, especially in Europe, keep a close watch on migration limits, and this compound manages to clear most hurdles without drama.
Tributyl citrate also breaks down more easily in nature than many entrenched alternatives. Water treatment plants and soil bacteria have an easier job chopping it apart. I’ve spoken to polymer chemists who see this as a key reason for adopting it in next-generation products aimed at responsible disposal or recycling.
For product developers, CITROFOL BI presents a way to tack toward safer, more responsible formulations. Weighing regulatory outcomes, chemical resistance, and user safety, it frequently slips past the obstacles that trip up more notorious options. The best results tend to happen when teams investigate how this plasticizer interacts with their own unique ingredients, running real-world aging and compatibility tests.
One step forward is sharing test results openly—avoiding trade secrets and keeping better chemistry practices out in the open. Then, supporting long-term studies on breakdown products in environments outside the lab, which can set benchmarks for even safer solutions to come. As customer safety and environmental cleanup remain in the spotlight, CITROFOL BI’s stable, adaptable, low-toxicity chemistry deserves thoughtful consideration.
Plastics aren’t just one single thing—they’re everywhere, in shapes and forms we might not even notice. CITROFOL BI, based on citrate, keeps a lot of these plastics soft, flexible, and usable. I’ve seen its reach in everyday products, and I think people rarely realize how much a single ingredient can change a product’s safety or performance. Picking up kids’ toys, reaching for a stretch-wrap in the kitchen, plugging in a set of wire earphones—chances are, CITROFOL BI is part of that experience.
Parents want safe toys for their children. Before customers demanded change, many toys contained plasticizers with concerning health effects, like phthalates. Restrictions arrived, companies scrambled, and materials needed to adapt. Here’s where CITROFOL BI popped up as a hero: made from citric acid, it avoids the hazards of older plasticizers. Plastic ducks, teethers, and balls often owe their comfy, pliable feel to this ingredient. I’ve seen firsthand the ease with which a manufacturer can shift to this option to satisfy EU and US safety requirements without complaints about performance.
Hospitals can’t use just any plastic in tubing, blood bags, or medical gloves. The wrong choice can leach unwanted chemicals into blood or medication. Years ago, hospitals grew wary of phthalate risks. CITROFOL BI stepped in, offering a safer alternative without sacrificing the flexibility these products must provide. It’s become common in blood bag films, patient ID bands, and certain types of packaging for medical equipment. The trend won’t slow down, because patients’ safety comes ahead of manufacturing convenience—something hospital supply managers stress all the time.
If you’ve ever wrapped a sandwich or stored leftovers in a cling film, a soft, non-toxic plasticizer likely played a role. Manufacturers must follow strict rules about what can touch food, especially in Europe and the US. CITROFOL BI, due to its origin from edible substances and good safety track record, lands in plenty of food wraps and flexible packaging. Someone with young children at home feels some relief, knowing their food storage isn’t quietly introducing unwanted chemicals into family meals.
Think about perfume bottles, coating in lip gloss tubes, or flexible beauty containers. Cosmetic companies look for plasticizers that touch skin or makeup without worry. CITROFOL BI meets this demand, so it’s found in the packaging for creams, lotions, or nail lacquers. I’ve heard some brands mention it specifically in their product transparency promises—they want customers to know what’s in contact with their bodies every day.
Look behind your desk, and cords snake everywhere—power, audio, phone chargers. Their sheathing stays tough yet pliable thanks to this plasticizer. In construction, floorings and wall coverings require durability as well as flexibility; here, cost and supply reliability matter alongside safety. CITROFOL BI gains ground as regulators push for cleaner alternatives in building materials.
The lesson here: safer ingredients like CITROFOL BI aren’t only for niche health shops or green products. Major industries have shifted, driven by practical needs and customer demands. Some hiccups remain, such as securing enough raw materials or aligning with environmental standards, but the trend is clear. For those interested in everyday safety, it pays to pay attention to the ingredients behind the plastics we touch. CITROFOL BI keeps showing up for good reasons.
Pick up a pack of sliced bread or a tub of yogurt, and you’re touching more than food. The material cradling those groceries matters just as much as what’s inside. Folks in the packaging industry look to substances like CITROFOL BI—also called triisobutyl citrate—to soften plastics, especially in things like cling film or bottle seals. People want packaging that’s flexible, strong, and keeps out air. But the question won’t go away: is CITROFOL BI actually safe for direct food contact?
Europe’s food safety authority (EFSA) has taken a close look at this additive. They say a person can take in up to 1 mg per kg of body weight every day, and not raise safety alarms. Tests have shown that it doesn’t cause genetic problems or trigger cancer in regular animal studies. The U.S. FDA also gave a green light for some food contact uses, as long as it stays within specific limits. Both Europe and the U.S. want to see strict controls on how much can migrate from the plastic into food, just to be cautious.
Most consumers don’t think about what softens their plastic wrap, they just want it to keep food fresh. The thing is, anything present in packaging could end up inside you. Kids often eat food straight from the package, which means they could take in more, simply because their small bodies process chemicals differently. There’s no outcry from poison control centers or hospitals related to CITROFOL BI, but this chemical is still part of a much bigger picture—dozens of additives, hundreds of plastics, and thousands of food products.
Nobody’s waving red flags about CITROFOL BI in the latest research, but science keeps evolving. What about breakdown products—substances that form as the chemical ages, especially with heat (think: microwave use)? Heavy exposure might not be a typical worry, but for people with allergies or certain medical conditions, even a rare reaction deserves attention. Plus, we eat from far more plastic containers today than most people did a generation ago, so tiny amounts might build up in ways we don’t fully understand.
Spot checks in factories aren’t enough. Packaging companies should run regular tests on how much CITROFOL BI actually shows up in different foods after packaging sits for weeks or months. Food makers can keep using alternatives like polyethylene or glass for goods needing extra safety assurance, instead of just leaning on plasticizers. Government agencies could tighten up rules, not just for single chemicals but for the whole stew of softeners and additives that end up next to your lunch. If a better, less questionable alternative comes along, big buyers should switch, even if it means a few cents added to each package.
When people read strange chemical names, worry shows up fast. Parents want some guarantee that all the little details have been checked and double-checked. Being open about the test results and risks—without burying them in jargon—lets shoppers make better choices. Trust grows when food companies and regulators clearly tell people what’s inside the plastics touching their food and how it might affect health over a lifetime.
People care more than ever about hidden ingredients and safety. CITROFOL BI doesn’t ring any big warning bells with current evidence, and most experts treat it as an acceptable choice under strict limits. That doesn’t mean we should let our guard down. Better oversight, new testing, and honest updates can keep food safer in a world where plastics and additives only grow more common each year.
| Names | |
| Preferred IUPAC name | Bis(2-butoxyethyl) benzene-1,2-dicarboxylate |
| Other names |
Triisononyl citrate TINIC Citric acid, tris (isooctyl) ester |
| Pronunciation | /ˈsɪtrəˌfɒl biː/ |
| Identifiers | |
| CAS Number | '203693-85-0' |
| Beilstein Reference | 1910864 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:53072 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL261492 |
| ChemSpider | 55718 |
| DrugBank | DB11262 |
| ECHA InfoCard | ECHA InfoCard string for product 'CITROFOL BI' is **03a1adb7-3a13-4795-b825-5026a7564951** |
| EC Number | EC 205-051-5 |
| Gmelin Reference | 1386051 |
| KEGG | C18717 |
| MeSH | D018357 |
| PubChem CID | 12652 |
| RTECS number | KL5345000 |
| UNII | UF3WS9D9CF |
| UN number | UN3082 |
| Properties | |
| Chemical formula | C14H26O4 |
| Molar mass | 418.6 g/mol |
| Appearance | Clear oily liquid |
| Odor | slight odor |
| Density | Density: 1.14 g/cm³ |
| Solubility in water | insoluble |
| log P | 1.61 |
| Vapor pressure | < 0.01 hPa (20 °C) |
| Basicity (pKb) | 8.2 |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.445 |
| Viscosity | 43–48 mPa·s |
| Dipole moment | 1.83 D |
| Thermochemistry | |
| Std molar entropy (S⦵298) | 395.8 J/(mol·K) |
| Std enthalpy of formation (ΔfH⦵298) | -1136.8 kJ/mol |
| Std enthalpy of combustion (ΔcH⦵298) | -7266.7 kJ/mol |
| Pharmacology | |
| ATC code | R03BB05 |
| Hazards | |
| Main hazards | May cause serious eye irritation. |
| GHS labelling | GHS labelling: not hazardous according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 (CLP/GHS) |
| Pictograms | GHS07 |
| Hazard statements | H412: Harmful to aquatic life with long lasting effects. |
| Flash point | > 204 °C |
| Autoignition temperature | 355 °C |
| Lethal dose or concentration | LD50/oral/rat = > 5000 mg/kg |
| LD50 (median dose) | > 5000 mg/kg |
| NIOSH | |
| PEL (Permissible) | 1 mg/m³ |
| REL (Recommended) | 0.2-1.0% |
| Related compounds | |
| Related compounds |
Citrofol AI Citrofol BII Citrofol AII |
